The Long Run
New Member
It was my understanding that the key to the success of HST was consistantly loading not only weight (and thus going down in reps) but increasing sets to make up for the lost volume.
So if a person can do 2 sets of 15s and then 3 sets of 10s easily, wouldn't it mean less progressive load to train in the 5s using 4 or even 5 sets?
One can factor in the fact that simply more weight@lower reps = more hypertrophy to justify going down in the sets in 5s, but something still doesn't settle in my mind about that?
Can someone explain what I'm missing?
So if a person can do 2 sets of 15s and then 3 sets of 10s easily, wouldn't it mean less progressive load to train in the 5s using 4 or even 5 sets?
One can factor in the fact that simply more weight@lower reps = more hypertrophy to justify going down in the sets in 5s, but something still doesn't settle in my mind about that?
Can someone explain what I'm missing?