Hi, I'm 54, 6'0, 162 pounds (would gravitate to about 150-155 naturally). I happened upon HST searching for a way to increase frequency yet stop the cycle of over-training that's followed me since I began lifting seriously 9 months ago. I'm a hard gainer and it's seemed from the beginning, if I didn't get enough frequency, gains don't happen. With frequency I overtrain rather easily.
I've kept good records since I started. 3x6-8 split to three days with multiple exercises per group, brought exceptionally good gains if repeated twice a week. This of course could not be sustained at my age. 5x5 brought great strength improvements but little bulk. Two regular seven-day splits brought nothing but maintenance for the most part. Aside from my ill-advised 2x 3 day split routine, all other routines were focused on "systemic" gains prioritizing squats and deads which I'd heard was a standard paradigm. My experience thus far shows that whatever muscle group is hit fresh within a routine will bulk. Anything further down in a traditional workout will not. Anything left fallow for seven days will not. As I started reading HST, it seemed to confirm my suspicions about tradition inhibiting my ability to bulk.
Toward the end of the last seven day split, seeing no gains and losing strength I'd gained on a previous 5x5 full-body, I bagged it and took the two weeks prior to where I should break and developed an HST test routine, just based on my well-known 10s. I did full-body AM-PM single set for 6 days (12 workouts, 2 weeks). The gains were astounding for what I am used to, having both scale weight and myotape readings "explode" in such a short period. I think this small test showed me a way to get the frequency I need. I found I had the energy to get two perfect sets each workout day this way, all the way to day 6, where I failed on the PM set for Mil and came within a hair on the Bench. Eliminating all failure sets and increasing quality sets seemed pretty spot-on for inducing hypertrophy while possibly keeping over-training at bay. The test was such a success I decided to go for it.
I've tested and calculated my 15s, 10s, and 5s and started on the 15s yesterday following a 10 day SD. Here's the program, it's basic. As I mentioned, it's done on a single set AM and one PM (the PM set is using plate mates for a micro-increase between calculated 5 pound progression, 10 on the Squats / Deads as these get only 3 shots within a RM range). I intentionally placed smaller muscle groups before larger for quality of sets on focus groups based on ignoring significance of "systemic" effect.
Military Press
Flat Bench Press
Bentover BB rows
Chin-ups (using Curls for 15s)
Triceps Dips (using Skull Crushers for 15s?)
Parallel Squat/Conventional Deads (done only AM and alternated between workouts)
Shrugs (AM only, not adhering to HST Rep Ranges)
Calf Raises (AM only, not adhering to HST Rep Ranges)
Crunches (AM, not overly relevant)
I'm using my most effective exercises based on CNS skill assuming the largest number of motor groups will fire. These end up being the most traditional which push the highest weight, that seems intuitively obvious but of course I could be wrong on that.
I'm using the AM/PM to ensure best effort on the sets with a minimum of 5 hours between but keeping PM over four hours from bedtime. Is this superior to using a single set each midday from an over-training potential standpoint, or a wash?
I've noticed that most HST programs use single set per workout day on 15s. Should I forego the PM workout during the 15s and save the training capacity? Is there any benefit to it?
Just to clarify goals, it's hypertrophy with no sport-specific aspects. What I'm targeting is higher frequency within reduced training capacity. Something I think could be important to all older less genetically inclined lifters with a fast metabolism. I'm attempting to find a balance that works for this lessor (within weight lifting populations) percentage set of variables.
I'm presuming this routine is in line with the principles but if not, please let me know where I'm thinking incorrectly.
Thanks
I've kept good records since I started. 3x6-8 split to three days with multiple exercises per group, brought exceptionally good gains if repeated twice a week. This of course could not be sustained at my age. 5x5 brought great strength improvements but little bulk. Two regular seven-day splits brought nothing but maintenance for the most part. Aside from my ill-advised 2x 3 day split routine, all other routines were focused on "systemic" gains prioritizing squats and deads which I'd heard was a standard paradigm. My experience thus far shows that whatever muscle group is hit fresh within a routine will bulk. Anything further down in a traditional workout will not. Anything left fallow for seven days will not. As I started reading HST, it seemed to confirm my suspicions about tradition inhibiting my ability to bulk.
Toward the end of the last seven day split, seeing no gains and losing strength I'd gained on a previous 5x5 full-body, I bagged it and took the two weeks prior to where I should break and developed an HST test routine, just based on my well-known 10s. I did full-body AM-PM single set for 6 days (12 workouts, 2 weeks). The gains were astounding for what I am used to, having both scale weight and myotape readings "explode" in such a short period. I think this small test showed me a way to get the frequency I need. I found I had the energy to get two perfect sets each workout day this way, all the way to day 6, where I failed on the PM set for Mil and came within a hair on the Bench. Eliminating all failure sets and increasing quality sets seemed pretty spot-on for inducing hypertrophy while possibly keeping over-training at bay. The test was such a success I decided to go for it.
I've tested and calculated my 15s, 10s, and 5s and started on the 15s yesterday following a 10 day SD. Here's the program, it's basic. As I mentioned, it's done on a single set AM and one PM (the PM set is using plate mates for a micro-increase between calculated 5 pound progression, 10 on the Squats / Deads as these get only 3 shots within a RM range). I intentionally placed smaller muscle groups before larger for quality of sets on focus groups based on ignoring significance of "systemic" effect.
Military Press
Flat Bench Press
Bentover BB rows
Chin-ups (using Curls for 15s)
Triceps Dips (using Skull Crushers for 15s?)
Parallel Squat/Conventional Deads (done only AM and alternated between workouts)
Shrugs (AM only, not adhering to HST Rep Ranges)
Calf Raises (AM only, not adhering to HST Rep Ranges)
Crunches (AM, not overly relevant)
I'm using my most effective exercises based on CNS skill assuming the largest number of motor groups will fire. These end up being the most traditional which push the highest weight, that seems intuitively obvious but of course I could be wrong on that.
I'm using the AM/PM to ensure best effort on the sets with a minimum of 5 hours between but keeping PM over four hours from bedtime. Is this superior to using a single set each midday from an over-training potential standpoint, or a wash?
I've noticed that most HST programs use single set per workout day on 15s. Should I forego the PM workout during the 15s and save the training capacity? Is there any benefit to it?
Just to clarify goals, it's hypertrophy with no sport-specific aspects. What I'm targeting is higher frequency within reduced training capacity. Something I think could be important to all older less genetically inclined lifters with a fast metabolism. I'm attempting to find a balance that works for this lessor (within weight lifting populations) percentage set of variables.
I'm presuming this routine is in line with the principles but if not, please let me know where I'm thinking incorrectly.
Thanks