I am looking to add back some hamstrings work other than squat initiation. I wondered if folks who have had the opportunity to use a reverse hyperextension machine have any thoughts on its merits versus RDLs or Good Mornings. I had good results at one time with alternating RDLs and leg curls, but eventually dropped the leg curls and then all hamstrings specific work after blowing out my back on RDLs. I realize I need to add it back and am thinking I need to work both hip extension and knee flexion aspects.
Knee flexion can be done with leg curls, but I am unsure if it is worth creating a home-made reverse hyper machine as opposed to just doing RDLs (scary after the back incident) or Good Mornings. I have done both RDLs and GMs and am not sure they are as effective at hitting the hams as I would like. There are a number of folks on the web who have made a rack-mounted reverse hyper machine and it looks to be fairly simple. But is it so much better than traditional exercises as to justify making one? Also, GMs and RDLs probably work the back better, making them a more natural lift, though I am not sure I would characterize them as compound exercises.
Thoughts?
Knee flexion can be done with leg curls, but I am unsure if it is worth creating a home-made reverse hyper machine as opposed to just doing RDLs (scary after the back incident) or Good Mornings. I have done both RDLs and GMs and am not sure they are as effective at hitting the hams as I would like. There are a number of folks on the web who have made a rack-mounted reverse hyper machine and it looks to be fairly simple. But is it so much better than traditional exercises as to justify making one? Also, GMs and RDLs probably work the back better, making them a more natural lift, though I am not sure I would characterize them as compound exercises.
Thoughts?