<div>
(CNoyes @ Oct. 17 2006,19:12)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE"><div>
(scientific muscle @ Oct. 16 2006,20:14)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">Why are you changing the number of sets, while doing the same reps??
I don't see the point in doing 2 sets of 10 reps and then the next week, doing 1 set of 10 reps. Unless your load has doubled, you are cutting your total work output in half, and this is not good for hypertrophy.
Modern research shows that progressive total work output is almost as important as progressive load for hypertrophy. Which is why most HSTers recommend doing 1 set during the 15s (15 total reps), 2 sets during the 10s (20 total reps), and 3-4 sets during the 5s (15-20 total reps). This way work output is progressing along with Load, since work=load x reps, and reps are fairly constant in the above routine. In your routine, every other week the workload drops significantly.</div>
I got that basic idea from the FAQ on number of sets. It says that the volume will decline as the weights get bigger.
I see your argument and it makes sense. I think I'll try to keep the number of total reps fairly constant throughout my next cycle.
From what I've read on this site, however, it seems that only 1-2 sets are needed. Is the 3-4 sets of 5s more than are needed? Would 1 set of 15s, 1 set of 10s, and 2 sets of 5s be better?</div>
That sounds fine, try it out for awhile. If you get no results, and the volume feels too easy for you, you can always add sets later on. I think it is better to start out with low volume and work up from there, rather than try to do too much, too early.