Most of them are scams, they contain boatloads of chemicals with no proven benefits of any kind. I'm just interested in any advances and it seemed tricreatine malate might have been one. It is more expensive than monohydrate and I think dosing very high gets rid of the bioavailability issue. I'm just always interested and thinking.[b said:Quote[/b] (Dianabol @ June 22 2004,9:16)]The newer creatines are perhaps, scams. They are costly and whatever fractional benefit you get from them simply do not justify their inflated cost.
Monohydrate is water soluble too by the way - warm water works well.
why? It has little to do with the creatine. The solubility of almost any substance is increased with higher temperatures, it's simple chemistry.[b said:Quote[/b] (Dianabol @ June 23 2004,9:35)]I'd be quite suspect of creatine that can only dissolve when the water-creatine mix is heated.
I'm only going for 10 grams per day. I just find it more convenient to carry it with me in one bottle, and I'm getting tired of people at work asking me why I keep shaking my water (quite a bit of the creatine settles on the bottom). It'd be convenient if I could just dissolve the stuff in some solution of some kind and fill my bottle every morning with the right dose.[b said:Quote[/b] (Dianabol @ June 23 2004,9:35)]Interestingly, how much creatine do you intend to take a day? Are you embarking on any loading protocol? If I might be so bold, why do you wish to take a huge batch to work?
This goes against my natural tendency to make things as difficult as possible. Neat, but difficult.[b said:Quote[/b] (Dianabol @ June 24 2004,10:45)]The other solution is to have a bigger bottle of water - this will help dissolve more creatine.