I've seen various approaches to # of sets across the rep ranges, but the "vanilla" one I was planning to follow for my first cycle was 1x15, 2x10, and 3x5. But when I do the math, the total amount of work done (weight x reps x sets) during the 10's is way more than the 5's. Is this a good thing, bad thing...or does it not matter?
I guess I expected that the total workload would ramp up steadily over the 8 weeks, and end in another SD period.
Does it make any sense to make the total number of reps per exercise constant in each rep range (1 set of 15's, 1.5 sets of 10's, 3 sets of 5's), or am I completely overthinking this?
Thanks.
I guess I expected that the total workload would ramp up steadily over the 8 weeks, and end in another SD period.
Does it make any sense to make the total number of reps per exercise constant in each rep range (1 set of 15's, 1.5 sets of 10's, 3 sets of 5's), or am I completely overthinking this?

Thanks.