combat_action
New Member
Thanks a lot. Nice to see other's like yourself frequent the hidden gem sites like elite. Awesome strength training posts over yonder.
Hi. I don´t think you know what load and unload means. Also, there is no black or white. So if you compare "teh DF style with teh standard 5x5 program", i think you haven´t understand it at all. Did you ever train this way? Or do you just copy and paste, and do you think that it´s just this only way, black or white? For your interest, there are many other coaches than just Coach Pendlay. And if you just read Pendlay, you just know Pendlay.[b said:Quote[/b] (Aaron_F @ Sep. 26 2005,7:13)]Compare teh DF style with teh standard 5x5 program Glenn recommends and you have two seperate things. Both unload, however one is specifically designed to over-reach, a point most people dont need to hit.[b said:Quote[/b] (Hypertrophier @ Sep. 27 2005,12:51)]True. You load, and then unload. Pretty complicated.
he ahs also said none of the programs are magical or required to achieve anything. His comments int he past have been do the simplest until it doesnt work. When you become advanced level lifter you need more complicated stuff to progress, most people just need to spend more time under the bar. Dual factor is for the upper level, becuase to achieve significant gains you have to plan far in advance, and develop a system to allow adequate fatigue and recovery to achieve optimal gains. I dont think I have talked to many people on this board who approach advanced/elite level. I certainly am not.
And FWIW, Glenn also has a book comming out shortly.
who said it was the only way. We are comparing a standard 5x5 as popularised by starr to DF as popularised by Matt Reynolds, john smith, madcow etc...[b said:Quote[/b] (Hypertrophier @ Sep. 27 2005,9:28)]Hi. I don´t think you know what load and unload means. Also, there is no black or white. So if you compare "teh DF style with teh standard 5x5 program", i think you haven´t understand it at all. Did you ever train this way? Or do you just copy and paste, and do you think that it´s just this only way, black or white?
Having read stuff from Doug Hepburn to Jim Wendler and onwards, what other coaches are you specifically talking about? Maybe we should go sets of 5 like hepburn did, combined with singles, or maybe mike mcdonalds type setup?, or Ted Arcidi? Or even multiple sets of 5 like utilized by coan/cpt kirk etc? Or maybe we just play with some of the meta-analysis research of Rhea and analyse adequate volume frequency and loading to devleop strength in novice or experienced athletes to come up with a similar loading frame, volume and frequency put forward by starr years ago? or maybe some of the early western commentaries on supercompensation by McFarlane? Or utilze texts from Siff or Zatsiorsky etc[b said:Quote[/b] ]For your interest, there are many other coaches than just Coach Pendlay. And if you just read Pendlay, you just know Pendlay.
Hmm, pendlayview? on a thread about 5x5 and combined with Bill starr's older work, Pendlay and Rippetoe are amonst the modern propoents of hte 5x5, and who's work has been split into the DF program? and not mention pendlay at all? Would that mean I shouldnt mention Bill Starr in the context of a 5x5 program? in case somebody thinks I have Starr-view?[b said:Quote[/b] ]Shall be no offense, but it looks like you have just the "pendlayview".
Abbreviated? posting entire posts is not abbreviated any way. And posting links, perhaps, but then wont people just know what he says and not what he knows? or will they beable to magically understand everything that he does by talking to him on the internet?[b said:Quote[/b] ]And you just know what he says, not what he knows. Next time, you should link to the other forum, where you quote from. Then the others have the possibility to get more pendlay posts, and make their own uncensored decisions, and further more, they can asks pendlay himself, instead of reading some abbreviated lines.
If its just load nad unload, why is the OP having issues with trying to setup a program?[b said:Quote[/b] ]I repeat it, you just have to load, and then unload. No magic.
Okay, you know some names, but do you know what they say?[b said:Quote[/b] (Aaron_F @ Sep. 28 2005,4:43)]who said it was the only way. We are comparing a standard 5x5 as popularised by starr to DF as popularised by Matt Reynolds, john smith, madcow etc...[b said:Quote[/b] (Hypertrophier @ Sep. 27 2005,9:28)]Hi. I don´t think you know what load and unload means. Also, there is no black or white. So if you compare "teh DF style with teh standard 5x5 program", i think you haven´t understand it at all. Did you ever train this way? Or do you just copy and paste, and do you think that it´s just this only way, black or white?
I guess your meaning load as meaning a period of loading (by whatever means) to try and achieve the state of over-reaching (a non-specific goal) and the concept of deloading/unloading to describe the manipulation of ntensity or frequency or volume to recover from the over-reached state and achieve the gains induced from the overall training period?
Having read stuff from Doug Hepburn to Jim Wendler and onwards, what other coaches are you specifically talking about? Maybe we should go sets of 5 like hepburn did, combined with singles, or maybe mike mcdonalds type setup?, or Ted Arcidi? Or even multiple sets of 5 like utilized by coan/cpt kirk etc? Or maybe we just play with some of the meta-analysis research of Rhea and analyse adequate volume frequency and loading to devleop strength in novice or experienced athletes to come up with a similar loading frame, volume and frequency put forward by starr years ago? or maybe some of the early western commentaries on supercompensation by McFarlane? Or utilze texts from Siff or Zatsiorsky etc[b said:Quote[/b] ]For your interest, there are many other coaches than just Coach Pendlay. And if you just read Pendlay, you just know Pendlay.
Or just use the likes of Louies set-up and do the ME/DE fun or maybe Boris Sheiko's olympic lifting setup to Powerlifting? or even go the insane route towards smolov? or try to manipulate the bulgarian methodology of olympic lifting into the powerlifting construct.?
Millions of 'coaches' and sources of information.
Hmm, pendlayview? on a thread about 5x5 and combined with Bill starr's older work, Pendlay and Rippetoe are amonst the modern propoents of hte 5x5, and who's work has been split into the DF program? and not mention pendlay at all? Would that mean I shouldnt mention Bill Starr in the context of a 5x5 program? in case somebody thinks I have Starr-view?[b said:Quote[/b] ]Shall be no offense, but it looks like you have just the "pendlayview".
Abbreviated? posting entire posts is not abbreviated any way. And posting links, perhaps, but then wont people just know what he says and not what he knows? or will they beable to magically understand everything that he does by talking to him on the internet?[b said:Quote[/b] ]And you just know what he says, not what he knows. Next time, you should link to the other forum, where you quote from. Then the others have the possibility to get more pendlay posts, and make their own uncensored decisions, and further more, they can asks pendlay himself, instead of reading some abbreviated lines.
If its just load nad unload, why is the OP having issues with trying to setup a program?[b said:Quote[/b] ]I repeat it, you just have to load, and then unload. No magic.
why does it take usually long or multiple articles to describe 'load and unload'?
Its not just load and unload. Its loading to achieve a specific level of fatigue followed by a period of unloading/deloading/accumulation/intensification to produce supercompensation over a mesocycle (weeks/months) rather than the single factor ie microcycle (days/week) focus (Matt reynolds often uses supercompsation to describe only the microcycle focus rather than the overall response to fatiguing/deloading setup in a macrocycle setup which is still supercompensation, just setup over a longer time period).
Without adequate planning (or a reasonable coach who does it for you) you are not going to achieve optimal results, and without some planning you can often get worse results (excessive fatigue making it difficult to recover from).
If the OP cannot setup the program, which direction do you think he will go from the 'load and unload' philosophy?
Your kidding right?[b said:Quote[/b] (Hypertrophier @ Oct. 03 2005,9:39)]Okay, you know some names, but do you know what they say?
You think load and unload is complicated? Every load and unload article deals at first with the history and some filling lines. Summed up, it´s just this: Do something, then do less. That is load and unload. After you load and unload, you load and unload again. No magic, and no state to reach. If you focus on a state you could get some real problems, cause the individuals aren´t the same. So they have to use their instinct, and you should know that, after reading all your lines from these authorities. Perhaps you should search some more about the topic, especially some other authors who don´t make it that complicated.