Hello everyone
First some details about me:
I am 41 yrs old and I am returning to training after many years off. During my time away from the gym I have predictably lost all that I once gained, going down from 12st to my previous untrained bodyweight of 10st.
I would classify myself as primarily an ectomorph (slim build, skinny wrists, naturally low bodyfat etc).
For around 10 years (late teens to late twenties) I trained using a HIT whole body routine on a 2-3 times a week basis and made some pretty good gains in strength and mass.
Now that we have the wonders of the internet, with its plethora of information, I have been busying myself doing alot of reading - both journal and informal articles - in an attempt to decide which routine would best suit me. I see that the old war of intensity vs volume still rages, but nevertheless out of this tangled mess of oftentimes conflicting information I have managed to gleam some elements of truth. For example, I no longer believe that training to failure (or beyond as I frequently did) is a requisite for stimulating growth and may even be counterproductive.
After much consideration I have decided to devote myself to HST. I am a scientist by profession, and I love the no-nonsense scientific approach that HST espouses.
My first question was going to be how best to go about progressing on exercises like the lat pulldown, where my 15RM is something like 40Kg but the stack only allows for increments of 5Kg, but I see this is covered in another thread, ie do 30x15x2sessions, 35x15x2sessions, then 40x15x2sessions - but what next - the 10's? Does 35x10x2sessions, 40x10x2sessions ,45x10x2sessions sound ok ?
I've just joined the local gym and am raring to go !!
I will keep you informed of my progress.
BTW is so-called muscle memory real or just anecdotal rubbish ? Over 10 years off is a large time-span but I was curious.

First some details about me:
I am 41 yrs old and I am returning to training after many years off. During my time away from the gym I have predictably lost all that I once gained, going down from 12st to my previous untrained bodyweight of 10st.
I would classify myself as primarily an ectomorph (slim build, skinny wrists, naturally low bodyfat etc).
For around 10 years (late teens to late twenties) I trained using a HIT whole body routine on a 2-3 times a week basis and made some pretty good gains in strength and mass.
Now that we have the wonders of the internet, with its plethora of information, I have been busying myself doing alot of reading - both journal and informal articles - in an attempt to decide which routine would best suit me. I see that the old war of intensity vs volume still rages, but nevertheless out of this tangled mess of oftentimes conflicting information I have managed to gleam some elements of truth. For example, I no longer believe that training to failure (or beyond as I frequently did) is a requisite for stimulating growth and may even be counterproductive.
After much consideration I have decided to devote myself to HST. I am a scientist by profession, and I love the no-nonsense scientific approach that HST espouses.
My first question was going to be how best to go about progressing on exercises like the lat pulldown, where my 15RM is something like 40Kg but the stack only allows for increments of 5Kg, but I see this is covered in another thread, ie do 30x15x2sessions, 35x15x2sessions, then 40x15x2sessions - but what next - the 10's? Does 35x10x2sessions, 40x10x2sessions ,45x10x2sessions sound ok ?
I've just joined the local gym and am raring to go !!
I will keep you informed of my progress.
BTW is so-called muscle memory real or just anecdotal rubbish ? Over 10 years off is a large time-span but I was curious.