This is sort of a bump, but I would like your thoughts on the progression that Mark Rippetoe thinks is reasonable, both in terms of bodyweight and weight on the bar.
First, he suggests to stay on the program for 3-9 months. Let's pick the squat as an example, say a trainee stays on it for 3 months, and chooses conservative weight increments. First workout 3*5*85 lbs (Mark's example), first 3 weeks 10 lbs gains = 3 weeks * 3 trainings * 10 lbs = 90 lbs, 85 + 90 = 175 bs. Then 2 more months 5 lbs per training = 2 months * 4 weeks * 3 trainings * 5 lbs = 120 lbs, 175 + 120 = 295. That is 3*5*295 lbs or 134 kgs after only 3 months of training, with an estimated 1RM of 332lbs/151kgs. This seems a bit excessive for only 3 months of training to me, I know pretty experienced and buff trainees that are around this level. What to you think?
Second, I think his BW progression ideas are based on endomorphs. BW wise, I am 6.2 and 198 lbs, and my genetic max according to the weight trainer calculator is a lean 220 lbs. However, after reading some posts on his forum, Mark would say I look unhealthy at my current weight, to drink a galon of milk a day (GOMAD) and beef the **** up to 240-250 lbs. As I already gain easily on 3700 kcal, the GOMAD approach would make me very fat, and would be a waste of money IMO. Moreover, I would not gain another 20 lbs of muscle on the short span of his program, so the extra calories will not contribute to my goal.
Am I selling myself and other trainees short, or are Mark's predictions unreasonable?