<div>
(BAX67 @ Nov. 14 2008,8:13)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">Nice pr Colby. Good to see your knees are feeling better. Some serious treadmill work will get you to your goal in no time.</div>
Next morning: I am sore, but my knees feel great.
If anyone recalls correctly, Michael Novak started a thread back in August-September requesting long-term data results from HST cycles. Well, I finally finished my reports of my 17 HST cycles. My road to 10% is on its 7th cycle now, and the calories that I have been cutting have been slow, but progression has been made.
I was looking for some key numbers that were similar between quality HST cycles for me. Cycle numbers 11 (July-Sep 2007), 14 (Feb-Mar 2008) and 17 (last one) were all cycles where I shed a point or so of body fat percentage and lost weight.
The following results are averages of these three cycles where the variance is very low (similar results between all three).
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">Cycle length: 60 days (8 weeks)
Prior SD: 8 days
Frequency: 3x/week
Exercises: 4 HST + 1 other
Zig-Zag: 90%
Macro Ratios (P-F-C): 26% - 39% - 33%
Omega 6 to Omega 3 ratio: 350% (these numbers were very close, 353, 359 and 350!)
Fiber: 18g
Protein: 157g</div>
I think these results are very telling. The 90% zig-zag has been by my optimal drop from RM to beginning of a next mesocycle. I had a feeling 3x/week frequency was optimal for me. Protein does not really matter for me so long as I get it around my workout. I actually work better with less exercises, probably because I can devote more time to some type of cardio. 8&8 is my code for length of a cycle... 8 days SD followed by 8 weeks (standard cycle length) of lifting. I was surprised that shorted SD's seemed to work better for me. I guess I shouldn't be as a shorter SD during a cut is the better way to go (less time to lose muscle).