Hi.
I've just re-read the FAQ.
This is a quote of Blade from the topic about negatives:
Since I train alone and negatives are not really an option for me, going for another 2 weeks of 5's is what I'm gonna do, but I feel that I'm not really sure why I will be doing that, since it contradicts the principle of progressive load...
I'd appreciate if someone that is familiar with HST theoretical basis would explain the reason for doing another micro-cycle of 5's.
Thanks
I've just re-read the FAQ.
This is a quote of Blade from the topic about negatives:
In the same topic there are some results from a study, showing why doing negatives is beneficial, but there is no explanation why using a constant load (5 R.M.) for another 2 weeks would be benefitial.[b said:Quote[/b] ]If you train alone, there are many exercises you can't do negatives on simply because you would need a partner to help you lift the weight first. If you do train alone - or if you feel any particular strains or aches - I would suggest that you just continue using your 5 rep max for each exercise for an additional 2 weeks after finishing the first 2 week block of 5s. You should see good results using your 5 rep max for an additional 2 weeks.
Since I train alone and negatives are not really an option for me, going for another 2 weeks of 5's is what I'm gonna do, but I feel that I'm not really sure why I will be doing that, since it contradicts the principle of progressive load...
I'd appreciate if someone that is familiar with HST theoretical basis would explain the reason for doing another micro-cycle of 5's.
Thanks