How important or unimportant are isolation movements? I read alot about how beginners should concentrait on the big compound movements to build up basic size and strenght and i agree with that 100% But there comes a point where the progression on these big movements slow and the gains stop. Thats why we try New routines like HST or turn to roids( I done both ). But some people almost totally slate isolation exercises as a waste of time, Fair enough if your a power lifter and dont mind looking like a big fat slob.
There is a writer whom i cant remember his name who slates compound movements and say bodybuilders should train like bodybuilder and not powerlifters. He says that your better off working in total isolation movements for every muscle. He uses examples like whats the point of going into the gym to train chest and then doing bench press when bench pressing uses so many muscle groups. Youl end up with big front delts and triceps more than chest development. Also that over head press is a waste of time as well your better off doing front raises, side laterals and rear delt raises in a superset.
Whats he says is youl will end up looking like a powerlifter if you train with mostly compound movements but if you train with mostly isolation movements you will end up with a nicely shaped body that others will admire. Now at first i thought this was total crap but as time goes on im starting to see some logic in what he says. I mean iv benched from the very first time i trained yet i dont have a great chest. It lags! Iv done many compounds for it like dips and all forms of benching but i have'nt dont alot of flyes or cables. Im thinking maybe i should use only these for a while and see if i get any developement in my chest. Also i notcied that I probably look more like a light powerlifter than a bodybuilder which also corrisponeds with what he says.
I dunno what do you make of it? Does anyone recognise what im talking about and know the name of the author?
There is a writer whom i cant remember his name who slates compound movements and say bodybuilders should train like bodybuilder and not powerlifters. He says that your better off working in total isolation movements for every muscle. He uses examples like whats the point of going into the gym to train chest and then doing bench press when bench pressing uses so many muscle groups. Youl end up with big front delts and triceps more than chest development. Also that over head press is a waste of time as well your better off doing front raises, side laterals and rear delt raises in a superset.
Whats he says is youl will end up looking like a powerlifter if you train with mostly compound movements but if you train with mostly isolation movements you will end up with a nicely shaped body that others will admire. Now at first i thought this was total crap but as time goes on im starting to see some logic in what he says. I mean iv benched from the very first time i trained yet i dont have a great chest. It lags! Iv done many compounds for it like dips and all forms of benching but i have'nt dont alot of flyes or cables. Im thinking maybe i should use only these for a while and see if i get any developement in my chest. Also i notcied that I probably look more like a light powerlifter than a bodybuilder which also corrisponeds with what he says.
I dunno what do you make of it? Does anyone recognise what im talking about and know the name of the author?