<div>
(robefc @ Jul. 30 2006,06:03)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE"><div>
(berserk @ Jul. 26 2006,18:14)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">I'm actually about to do some time tests to find different ways of doing my workout using supersets. I will trial things like doing 2 reps of chins / 2 reps of shoulder press / repeat with no rest . . .instead of doing more consequtive reps. I wonder which method is the most time efficient?</div>
I'm doing something similar, although this has come about because I'm working out max-stim style.
So for bis and tris I will do right arm conc curl, left arm conc curl, right arm db extension, left arm db extension, repeat 19 times!
I would like to dops and chins like this but it would only work if I dipped and chinned the same weight which I don't.
If I was working out with conventional sets than I would just alternate sets...otherwise you're basically turning it into a max-stim style set.
Cheers
Rob</div>
Doing one bi curl rep, then a tri extension rep, then back to a bi rep, etc. seems a bit time-inefficient since it takes quite a bit of relative time to change postions, put the dummbell down and pick it up again, etc. I suppose it's not too bad with dummbells like that but imagine doing a rep of bench press, a rep of seated row, a rep of bench press, etc - you would spend so much time moving between the two work stations.
As for supersetting the dips with chins, why would it matter if using different absolute loads? So long as the load is the same approximate rep-max for both exercises it will be fine. But I'm guessing your point is that if you have to change the weights on your belt it becomes time-consuming and that's what we're talking about.