TangoDown
Member
Never really see it mentioned here, which could be a tell-tale sign of what you all think lol.
Personally, I think the concept is novel - getting regular joes with no experience to learn both your standard compound and Olympic movements and challenge them through exercise that's a lot more intensive than "30 minutes a day aerobic Zumba hip hop Richard Simmons circuit."
Yet, off paper, you've got little to no progression or consistency in programming and quality of clubs in terms of how effectively they teach you and how much they monitor even acceptable exercise form is all over the place. Combined with the philosophy of kipping (kipping pullups, kipping dips, etc), does Cross-Fit really have a place outside of it's own little niche, and is it nearly as effective as building a strong and fit individual as traditional programs?
Not to mention how expensive the clubs are...
Personally, I think the concept is novel - getting regular joes with no experience to learn both your standard compound and Olympic movements and challenge them through exercise that's a lot more intensive than "30 minutes a day aerobic Zumba hip hop Richard Simmons circuit."
Yet, off paper, you've got little to no progression or consistency in programming and quality of clubs in terms of how effectively they teach you and how much they monitor even acceptable exercise form is all over the place. Combined with the philosophy of kipping (kipping pullups, kipping dips, etc), does Cross-Fit really have a place outside of it's own little niche, and is it nearly as effective as building a strong and fit individual as traditional programs?
Not to mention how expensive the clubs are...