bbufflikebroly
New Member
Any new studies that validate some principles or have a counter argument to some of the principles used in the program? Also any new studies that we can add on to the program?
Any New Studies?
- Thread starter bbufflikebroly
- Start date
bbufflikebroly
New Member
Bumping some studies
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809742/ (general studies in how to build muscle)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24714538 (both types of PL and BB training generate similar hypertrophy)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25853914 (both high and low load to failure create similar hypertrophy)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562558/ (mentions that high resistance training may have greater improvements for strength and hypertrophy)
It seems that light loads also induce hypertrophy but they have to be taken to failure
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809742/ (general studies in how to build muscle)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24714538 (both types of PL and BB training generate similar hypertrophy)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25853914 (both high and low load to failure create similar hypertrophy)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562558/ (mentions that high resistance training may have greater improvements for strength and hypertrophy)
It seems that light loads also induce hypertrophy but they have to be taken to failure
Here's a nice one in support of Strategic Deconditioning.
I personally think that strategic deconditioning is critical. This year I took about 3 months off and consider it to be one of the best things I did. Surprisingly, I did not seem to lose all that much in muscle. I doubt that you need to take that much time off, but I am thinking regular 2 week SD's will be part of my regimen.