My friends different workout system

  • Thread starter Thread starter imported_domineaux
  • Start date Start date
I

imported_domineaux

Guest
I was talking with a workout friend at the gym about his training method. He mentioned his program was a simple progressive plan. He mentioned he’d had very good gains over the past year.

He shared with me what he was doing and I do see some comparisons, but I’m not sharp enough on HST to really define differences that would dramatically favor HST over his current training method.

I’ll try to describe his method as best I can as explained to me.

He does some warm-up sets for about 5-10 minutes. Pretty basic stuff that involves as much of his body as possible using appx. 15# db.

He takes on the large muscle groups first – squats – dead lifts – bench press, etc.

He proceeds through his routine and finishes within 1 hour max. He does use compound exercises pretty well all the time.

There is a difference in the selection of weights and how he trains.

When he goes to a new weight level –

He selects a weight that he feels he can manage at least 4 reps x 3 sets. He proceeds and performs the sets. He writes the weight/reps/sets down on a 3 x 5 card. He said it’s great if he can do the exercise 6 or 8 reps x 3 sets instead of 4 reps it moves him through a circle faster. I think his use of circle would be what we call a cycle.

This is the procedure he uses for each exercise to start.

He does weight training every other day. Each workout he looks at the 3 x 5 card and selects the exercise and previous weight again and this time he tries to perform at least 2 to 4 more reps per set, or 6 reps x 3 sets minimum. Each workout thereafter he continues in this fashion until he reaches a maximum of 10 reps x 3 sets. Achieving 10 reps is not set in stone it’s just a guideline to the maximum reps before starting back at a heavier weight he can manage at least 4 reps x 3 sets. He mentioned on average he moves from circle starting at 4 reps to 10 reps in about 3 to 4 workouts max. He said he wasn’t rigid on how much to increase the weight on the start of a new circle, because he said if he could manage it he did. I asked what he did if he was having a good day and he could hit the ten reps right off. He said, “I’d just go with it, and if I couldn’t handle a weight increase next workout first set I’d just back off to previous weight and go on like normal.” I asked what he would do if he didn’t think he was strong enough to handle an increase and still do 4 reps x 3 sets. He laughed and said, “I just repeat the last weight.”

This he said was an exciting part of his little program. He could make adjustments on the fly “no problemo”.

On his 3 x 5 card he has each exercise listed and he keeps a log each time he completes an exercise. He said the log is critical, because he’d lose track of where he was with all the reps and weights. He said carrying around the card was a little too detailed for him, but he couldn’t remember where he was if he didn’t have it.

He mentioned good gains and excellent improvements in strength. He does do some weightlifting type exercises and no isolation exercises as far as I can tell. Obviously, he is getting stronger because he is constantly lifting heavier and heavier. It’s hard to tell in the time I’ve known him if he’s gained body mass, because he’s always pumped when I see him.

When I mentioned zig-zags, moving from 15s to 10s to 5s he laughed and said,”that’s @$$ backwards.” I tried to explain. He was cordial enough, but obviously very happy with his methods. He did say the decrease in volume of the HST would bother him, because he is constantly increasing his volume the way he is training. I mentioned the Hyper-trophy adaptation thing to him and he seemed to have a good grasp of adaptation. He said, “ When he went to the higher weight at lower reps he was moving less volume and the weight change didn’t seem to hinder his growth or recovery.” I didn’t refute that, because I’m not sure I could.

Interestingly enough he mentioned something I thought was pretty smart. If he was feeling some pain in joints or didn’t feel like he was able to take on a next round at a higher weight in an exercise he would do a couple of days of that one exercise at weight appx 40% lower than last for 20 reps x 3 sets. He appeared to understand the role of high reps to get a good burn for strengthening joints and soft tissue. I mentioned it to him and he said he’d learned that, because in the past he would exercise to 20 reps before increasing the weight.(starting over at lower reps-heavier weight). He said the volume at 20 reps was Ok, but felt like it slowed him down too much.

I asked about injuries and he said he had always been pretty well injury free. He felt the progressive increases were very manageable.

I told him about the HST period SD for recovery. He was interested to know more about that. Actually he is doing something like that now, but not on a regular type basis. He has a lot of out of town relatives and he frequently goes off for a week or more during the year and cannot workout. He mentioned that he didn’t start at higher weights when he returned, but he did start where he left off. I mentioned that in HST he would start at a higher weight, but I couldn’t’ explain what difference that would make. I did speculate a bit, but he thought the way he was doing it was fine. He’d been increasing the weight soon enough for him.

I posted this, because next to HST this is the best looking training program I’ve seen. Maybe I was enthralled with it, because it is a disciplined and structured program.

Maybe some of you with more HST experience can make some comparisions or point out some issues in this program or at least explain some things as you see them. Things that are wrong about it for sure.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (domineaux @ April 28 2005,4:10)]I told him about the HST period SD for recovery.
Don't forget, Strategic "Deconditioning" is not about recovery or even rest. It is done in order to stimulate the tissue to undo some of its protective adaptations.
thumbs-up.gif
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Bryan Haycock @ April 28 2005,6:58)]
[b said:
Quote[/b] (domineaux @ April 28 2005,4:10)]I told him about the HST period SD for recovery.

Don't forget, Strategic "Deconditioning" is not about recovery or even rest. It is done in order to stimulate the tissue to undo some of its protective adaptations.  
thumbs-up.gif

I understand your need as the author of the HST system to communicate SD is much more than recovery, but I still don't think recovery should be excluded.

When I layoff and don't workout for 9 to 13 days all that comes into my mind is a big rest period.
sleeping.gif
I'm going to back off on all the supplements after the first couple of days on the SD and do a few things I've wanted to do instead of going to the gym.
 
I would therefore consider, recovery is a part of SD because it's a component of not doing any workout for 9-13 days. I realize after reading your article on SD, recovery is not the  purpose or the most beneficial part of SD for growth.

Guys like me will usually not articulate information as carefully as a someone like yourself in your field of expertise.  We'll tell it like the hearer or reader can understand it as best we can. If he/she wants better information they can research it.
-----------------

I'd be very interested to know your take on the guys exercise program. I'm definitely not unhappy with HST, the guy's program just tweaked my interest. I guess because it seemed so simple, and he is getting rewarded for his efforts.
blush.gif


Maybe his program will fail, maybe he'll get burned by it. I don't know, just thought his approach was straight forward,   very disciplined and simple to manage.  I dont' think it's simpler than HST, because I sure don't need a card or notes to workout and manage HST.

thumbs-up.gif
 
You didn't mention his training experience, or if you did then I forgot it. This seems like a program that would be good for improving strength in someone who is relatively new to lifting, i.e. someone who has plenty of strength to gain. It probably wouldn't work so well for an advanced trainee because you can't keep getting stronger every workout, eventually you'll either hit a ceiling or your strength gains will come much slower. BTW, I believe that adding a little bit of weight to your big lifts every workout, or just about, is called microloading.

So basically your friend's focus is on progressing, but not progressing in the same way that HST advocates. He aims for a little more weight or a few more reps, whereas in HST progression means increasing by ~5% of your 5RM every workout. This is definitely a bigger and more frequent increase than what your friend uses, and because of this and the fact that RBE will not have set in, it will cause more microtrauma than microloading. And cranking out another rep or two has more to do with intensity and fatigue, and in turn strength, than it does with hypertrophy. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it's just not HYPERTROPHY-SPECIFIC.

Let your friend use his program as long as he is making gains and not burning himself out. But eventually he won't be able to keep progressing. At that point he'll need to either get stronger using some strength program, or take an SD and re-sensitize himself to lighter weights.
 
The next time I see him I'll ask a few more questions. I might be able to answer or discuss more things now, but most of it would just be speculation on my part.

I'm also trying to put together some more questions to ask him myself.

If your interested and have any questions. I'll ask him.
 
It's actually pretty similar to a standard HIT program with some periodic downcycling, except that he avoids training to failure. Which is to say, his program follows the tenets of double progression (which is the foundation for pretty well nearly all strength training program.) As long as he's making load progressions periodically, he'll grow.

My hunch is that he's choosing weights that roughly correspond to his 8RM. He spends the first half of his minicycles adapting to the new weight, which includes working off the level of strain associated with a new weight, as well as acclimating yourself to a new record. The 3 sets helps you do the latter; the low # of reps helps you do the former. Then, through the 2nd half of the minicycle, he builds up his metabolic resistance to that weight, and essentially tests himself beyond the original confines of that weight during his last workout of the minicycle. If he gets beyond 8 reps (i.e. 10 reps), he's ready to progress. He finds his new 8RM and starts over again.

My assumption is that his load increases are usually less than 5% (If they weren't, he'd have a 300lbs bench press right now.) It's a good strength-specific plan. And because he's training fairly often and making load progression, he's growing along with it too.

cheers,
Jules
 
Yeah, this routine is basically what I used a long time ago when I first started out. It works, to a point, and you get stronger, but the size gains stall out. Looking back from my HST perspective the increments were too small to generate real growth.
 
Back
Top