I
imported_flow
Guest
It has been stressed many times that small increments might be beneficial for strength, but one shouldn't go below 5% RM in order to elicit an optimal hypertrophic response. If this caused too much zig-zagging, one should rather repeat workouts than use smaller increments.
My question: does it really make a difference whether I increment 2,5 lbs each workout, or 5 lbs every other workout? The rate of progression (5lbs every other workout) is identical.
Thus, if repeating workouts is a sanctioned practice, shouldn't smaller increments be sanctioned, too (I'm not talking about 1/16 lbs microloading )? Or, conversely, shouldn't repeating workouts be "outlawed" because it decreases progression rate? I just can't believe that my muscles and CNS are so smart that they can distinguish between the two methods of progression mentioned before, and adapt in different ways.
My question: does it really make a difference whether I increment 2,5 lbs each workout, or 5 lbs every other workout? The rate of progression (5lbs every other workout) is identical.
Thus, if repeating workouts is a sanctioned practice, shouldn't smaller increments be sanctioned, too (I'm not talking about 1/16 lbs microloading )? Or, conversely, shouldn't repeating workouts be "outlawed" because it decreases progression rate? I just can't believe that my muscles and CNS are so smart that they can distinguish between the two methods of progression mentioned before, and adapt in different ways.