Ok, before everyone starts posting "Its obvious!" or "HIIT is the way to go"
Hear me out, I think my thought makes sense logically.
Ive been really busy with work, so havent had much chance to come on here, so I hope Im not bringing up a commonly talked about topic.
My understanding is:
1. if you have a calorie deficit, you lose weight...Calorie surplus, you gain weight.
2. Low intensity cardio pulls most of its energy from fat after about 20 minutes.
3. High intensity/Intervals/HIIT/etc doesn't burn as much "fat" calories...but it burns more calories overall.
Plus it continues to burn calories throughout the day (afterwards), since it has to replace the glycogen that it used up for fuel.
So my thought is that:
If you are beefy aka muscular but not much definition, then HIIT is the way to go. You have to get rid of excess calories, so you can show the muscles you do have.
BUT, if you are skinny with a bit of a gut, then low intensity is the way to go.
Since you cannot afford to lose any extra calories (you need as much as you can get to keep the little muscle you do have) you should try to burn only calories from fat.
So I was thinking low intensity, 45-60 minutes quick walk is better for a skinny person than Sprints/HIIT/etc.
This makes sense to me, but everyone I've spoken to says "Forget low intensity, HIIT is the way to go"
Thoughts?
Thanks
Hear me out, I think my thought makes sense logically.
Ive been really busy with work, so havent had much chance to come on here, so I hope Im not bringing up a commonly talked about topic.
My understanding is:
1. if you have a calorie deficit, you lose weight...Calorie surplus, you gain weight.
2. Low intensity cardio pulls most of its energy from fat after about 20 minutes.
3. High intensity/Intervals/HIIT/etc doesn't burn as much "fat" calories...but it burns more calories overall.
Plus it continues to burn calories throughout the day (afterwards), since it has to replace the glycogen that it used up for fuel.
So my thought is that:
If you are beefy aka muscular but not much definition, then HIIT is the way to go. You have to get rid of excess calories, so you can show the muscles you do have.
BUT, if you are skinny with a bit of a gut, then low intensity is the way to go.
Since you cannot afford to lose any extra calories (you need as much as you can get to keep the little muscle you do have) you should try to burn only calories from fat.
So I was thinking low intensity, 45-60 minutes quick walk is better for a skinny person than Sprints/HIIT/etc.
This makes sense to me, but everyone I've spoken to says "Forget low intensity, HIIT is the way to go"
Thoughts?
Thanks