No incline barbell bench at my school gym, unfortunately.
Scale increasing about 0.25-1lb a week.
Yeah, I wonder if that's the case too.
I know you've got a ton of experience in this realm. What is something I could do in 50 minutes 2 times a week (and unlimited time once a week, thus 3 times total) in the realm of powerlifting and strength gain where I could continuously see an increase to the 3 main lifts? It seems like my DL and my squat are not stalling, but my upper body has. That will be confirmed or dismissed in 2 weeks.
Well if the scales are going vertically, and the waistline isn't going (
too) horizontal, then you're definitely doing those things right. Although 1/4 of a pound is only 110gms in measurements that count, so personally I'm calling that one clothes/food in bowels/hydration/not statistically significant.
My type of training draws on HST principles but these days isn't obviously reminiscent of vanilla-HST.
I increment when I can, SD when size and//or strength gains stop (or when the body says 'break time'). I don't do too much in the way of warmups; I think they're overrated//overvalued if you aren't injured and additionally, I don't work legs for size these days (big enough, and the benefits of plyometric training are of more value to the activities I like to do). I basically advocate training up to your 5RM, and then pushing that # higher until you can't. SD//deload, start again at what would be a couple of increments below 5RM, work your way back up to 5RM and keep clustering using a rep count of 11-17ish. you can keep pushing it with clustered-singles to get that rep count higher, but CNS-wise it will come back to bite you.
I think volume is certainly important, and obviously I think rep-count is more important than set-rep matrix, but load always matters the most.
It's also not easy to 'grow' all lifts, and therefore body-parts, over the same time period. If your deads and squats are going up, you might just have to ride that and not expect the same for upper-body right now. Having said that, there's no reason all of them can't go up at the same time.
High-rep work is critical IMO. Keeps your partitioning where you want it to be, will prevent excess fat gain and keeps you looking good and full (shuttling glycogen into your muscles is what makes us look 'full') - critical from a psychological and motivational perspective.
For me, I'd be wanting to get this done:
10-12 deadlift reps
10 squat reps
10-12 row/pull/chin reps
10-12 pushing-chain reps
50minutes is not a lot of time.
So I think I would alternate the leg exercises between workouts. I wouldn't waste much time on warm ups (waste from my a time perspective). Especially considering that once you do your first upper-body exercise, your elbows, shoulders and spine are essentially 'warmed up'. I'd cluster my reps, try and make sure I'm resting a solid 2.5 or 3 mins between clusters and throw in a high rep set at the end, ballpark 15-20RM. This would be for upper body only, as walking is 'high rep' work for the legs.
All reps above to be done at the working load. Maybe a warm up set around 70% of that load if required.
I'm also not a massive believer in 'strict, perfect, slow-as-mollases reps that take away from power and natural concentric&eccentric speeds.
Pretty much everything I've learned & observed over the years says that size and strength go hand-in-hand. HST as a series of principles that optimises 'extraction' of size from each level of strength you attain, but ultimately you need both. Lifting technique helps; getting better at a given movement. Nothing there is surprising. But your strongest lean 80kg guy is not lifting as much as your strongest lean 100kg guy.
I don't think the isolations are necessary at all, but it's hard to get ppl accepting that sometimes.