@Rihad - you haven't prevailed in the discussion. You clearly believe yourself to be correct, and there's no harm in that, but you still haven't proven your case. I, for one, am always willing to accept when I've been shown to be mistaken and would happily acknowledge it in this discussion. But you haven't done that. You argument is mere opinion and centred upon the range of motion. A simple comparison to an exercise such as the deadlift invalidates this premise. Any introduction of physics to the equation likewise destroys your argument.
Furthermore, your style of argument relies on quoting nobodies on the internet. Hell, if that was all it took to make a convincing viewpoint, I'd go and set-up a site under a false name. Martin/Lean Gains isn't an authority. Neither is Lyle, Alan Argon or Casey Butt. There's no supported scientific literature that actually describes the genetic potential based on phenotype development (height). You also aren't regarding bone density variance, hydration, genetic outliers etc.
You've exhibited a habit that Totentanz has accurately described several times. You also have a quote-happy approach to discussion that relies on opinions, and not data. This is why O&G is pissed off. It has nothing to do with the points of view, and everything to do with your inability to scientifically support your point of view.
