stevejones
Member
<div>
(Aaron_F @ Feb. 13 2007,01:23)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE"><div>
(stevejones @ Feb. 13 2007,18:09)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">Also, ronnie coleman is too small to be taken seriously...shaquille oneal outweighs him easily</div>
Wow, I didnt know size was solely decided by weight? or do you live in a strange meathead world? oh and by the way, size has nothing to do with muscularity either (and I never said muscular size), so posting pictures of lee priest are not much use, but nice use of posting a picture of somebody who is a darn site heaver than zane ever was(comp trim, offseason whatever), while being 5" shorter, making him a whole lot bigger. Lee was bigger as a teen lifter in Aussie.
and
whats shaq's weight? 325
whats ronnies offseason weight? ooh, from ronnies site 330</div>
you're just too small to be taken seriously, sorry
(Aaron_F @ Feb. 13 2007,01:23)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE"><div>
(stevejones @ Feb. 13 2007,18:09)</div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">Also, ronnie coleman is too small to be taken seriously...shaquille oneal outweighs him easily</div>
Wow, I didnt know size was solely decided by weight? or do you live in a strange meathead world? oh and by the way, size has nothing to do with muscularity either (and I never said muscular size), so posting pictures of lee priest are not much use, but nice use of posting a picture of somebody who is a darn site heaver than zane ever was(comp trim, offseason whatever), while being 5" shorter, making him a whole lot bigger. Lee was bigger as a teen lifter in Aussie.
and
whats shaq's weight? 325
whats ronnies offseason weight? ooh, from ronnies site 330</div>
you're just too small to be taken seriously, sorry