<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">You were justifying his size by his accomplishments. His accomplishments do not make him bigger.</div>
No, I simply said he was a mr. olympia, and from that you construe way too much.
According to wikipedia, he was 185 contest weight & had 18.5" arms at a height of 5'9". With those measurements, I think it's ridiculous to call him small and then post 10 times trying to justify your position. So, you think what you want and compare him to as many olympians as you wish. With those stats, Frank Zane was not a small man.
Yeah, Joe, your initial question to this board was what do we think about Lyle's program. The problem I have with Lyle is that on his website he said he has worked with mostly endurance athletes, just a few powerlifters and some bodybuilders. If I was a triathlete, I'd be interested, but those credentials aren't impressive enough for me as a bber....well, powerlifter...whatever I am, lol.
There is something that Aaron said about coaching which is often very true, not only in bbing circles but almost all sports. Very often the best coaches kind of sucked in their sports, or at least they weren't spectacular, despite trying hard. Despite having a slow start, I've had some...mildly spectacular I suppose ...success at bbing. I've attributed alot of it to being good at recognizing different programs that would work, but perhaps my genetics are better than I had previously thought.
Maybe guys who aren't as genetically gifted are more patient with science than I am, and the physiques or perceived lack of experience from guys like Lyle doesn't bother them. Maybe guys like Lyle have to go through the same challenges as them, so they are better able to relate to him. I have just never had to delve deeply into science to get the results I want. As soon as I think I've reached a plateau, I'll get on some new program and impress myself again. Guess not everyone can do that.