okay. eat a 250 g bag of pistachios and you´ll get your fiber-but you will also get some carbos. otherwise, you´ll have to deal with the squirts. But be aware when you have reached your desired body fat with no carb, as soon as you start eating carbs, they will get stored. And the studies with Inuit diets were eucaloric and even functioning at negative energy balance. I am not sure if no carb is your new permanent nutritional protocol.
When I get to work in a n hour or so, I will scan in some pages from "the text book of work physiology" were it clearly shows that unless one is a three-toed sloth, no carbs makes no sense.
No carbs and a keto-genic diet may have a therapeutic effect ( and this is not scientifically beyond doubt), but for the healthy people here who are constantly training with already low body fat percentages (<12%), it makes no sense if the intensity of your workouts get your heart rate above 75% your max heart rate. Even at aerobic levels, the body still burns carbs with an almost equal rate as fat.
You are not an Inuit which has grown up and evolved with very low carb. If you start going Inuit, even 5% carbs will negate the effects as shown in the the paper posted above.
If body fat is less then 10% and one is not amping up with T and other substance, it will be difficult to keep shedding fat. It is hard to get around low carb and negative energy balance as a sensible method to shed fat and maintain sanity. Here I am talking about Fat, Protein, and Carbs from veggies first followed by fruits. 20% carbs is low enough and avoids non-sense. Patience is required. I understand the desires of competitive body-builders, and if this is the case, T et.al., is often part of the equation.
I shed dropped almost 20 kg with low carb, but the carbs came exclusively from veggies and fruits. I ate no grain products.