leonardopm
Member
Sorry, I made a stupid question. It's obvious that I can do it many ways. My gym has weighted strips for the ankles, I can use them.
Ditto. True adepts shouldn't be using any kind of DUP, even if it's superior to HST's SD+linear progression. It's non-scientific, because, if we quote Bryan,I'm not convinced that HST and DUP are compatible if you buy into Bryan's thoughts on exposure to load. i.e. if you expose yourself to 8RM in week 1, then doing 12RM work the following week is pointless other than potential metabolic stress; it isn't heavy enough to induce microdamage and the necessary adaptations (hypertrophy) that follow.
HST is not a "guess" like all the previous muscle building programs. It is a method based on the
physiology of muscle growth.
Ditto. True adepts shouldn't be using any kind of DUP, even if it's superior to HST's SD+linear progression. It's non-scientific, because, if we quote Bryan,
I now use DUP with HST all the time because some studies have shown DUP to be superior to weekly or bi-weekly period changes. I have also seen better results in lagging muscle parts and it is less boring.
RPE is mostly used in evaluating aerobic exercise programs. It's usefulness in hypertrophic or strength weight lifting is limited, at best. It may be more useful to Cross Trainers, Circuit Trainers and the like. I see no benefit when incorporated with programs based on HST principles although I am certainly open to becoming more educated about this.
If, in fact, you are really looking for an auto regulation technique, going to failure or, even better yet in my opinion, going to within one or two reps of failure is a time proven effective auto regulator for weight lifting and reduces the subjectivity to close to zero.
I question even RPE's usefulness in aerobic training due to its highly subjective and individualistic rating scale. Even its acronym contains the letter P standing for perceived. Heart rate monitoring, adjusted for your aerobic conditioning, is probably a better measure of intensity.
Good question though. It is nice to see people inject new thoughts to mull over.
Just my $.02 although some would say it is only worth $.01.
Your pic makes you look pretty doggone good now. If your lifts are increasing, how can you not grow? Personally I would like to see some metabolic work in there from time-to-time also.
What you are doing seems to be working so I would wait until I started to stall out. Or, alternatively, exchange my power w/o every other Wednesday for a metabolic workout of 15-20 reps.
You're kidding me... at his bf%, the avatar represents the pinnacle of naturally achievable size and form. If he isn't natural, well, then his mode of training and nutrition isn't that important, he could even grow this big using vanilla HST SD+progression principles.If I remember rightly @golfnut's avatar was pre HST but made significant gains when did his first cycle of HST.
I've actually put on 13-15 pounds of lean mass since that picture.
Yes 13lbs of lean mass gained but he hasn't stated what fat was gained, but at competition standing at 1.65m (5 foot 5 inches) at 60kgs (132lbs) at circa 4% body fat gives a fat free mass index of around 21.2 would not suggest steroid use, but only golfnut can confirm this.You're kidding me... at his bf%, the avatar represents the pinnacle of naturally achievable size and form. If he isn't natural, well, then his mode of training and nutrition isn't that important, he could even grow this big using vanilla HST SD+progression principles.
This line pretty much confirms not being natural:
You're kidding me... at his bf%, the avatar represents the pinnacle of naturally achievable size and form. If he isn't natural, well, then his mode of training and nutrition isn't that important, he could even grow this big using vanilla HST SD+progression principles.
This line pretty much confirms not being natural:
Yes 13lbs of lean mass gained but he hasn't stated what fat was gained, but at competition standing at 1.65m (5 foot 5 inches) at 60kgs (132lbs) at circa 4% body fat gives a fat free mass index of around 21.2 would not suggest steroid use, but only golfnut can confirm this.