<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">I tried to do deadlifts without shoes. It was neat; that's about all I can do to describe the experience.</div>
Yeah, I think I might permanently do my DL's without shoes. Granted, if I ever get to a high enough weight where I feel like I am risking injury without the support I might decide otherwise. But unlike squats, you really don't have to get "set" while supporting a bunch of weight, since we get our stance ready before moving any weight. So I don't really see too much possibility for wobbling our ankles. Any of you guys pulling 400+ feel differently? I just really feel like I get a whole lot more drive off the ground without the shoes.
<div></div><div id="QUOTEHEAD">QUOTE</div><div id="QUOTE">I did 10 reps in a regular set for a given exercise. I took a half minute break and then went to do another 10 reps, but Max-Stim style.....I may eventually turn this into full blown Max-Stim, but I am following Slapz log a bit as he is working out Max-Stim only half of the time too.
</div>
I don't have anything to back this up... but just thinking about it some, if you could get all 20 reps with doing half and half (conventional and MS), why would you want to bother going full MS? You are still doing the same amount of work, but you keep the endurance gain of doing a full set which might come in handy when the weights gets heavy.
I almost look at MS as medicine. Use it only when needed. I almost want to give MS a full cycle's try just to know how it really feels to use it in its entirety. I guess I'm just trying to say that, if you have a desired rep total, and you know how much weight you are going to use, why not get what you can with normal reps, THEN use MS to get to your goal.
Not criticizing your routine by any means, I'm just interested in getting other opinions on that as I'm getting close to building up by second routine next week.