1lb per week is pretty mild; 440gms using a real measurement. Not eager to push for a 1kg? If you stick to doing weights in the 5's, you should lose barely any muscle at all.
Kinda looks like Bill Starr, actually.
HLM is garbage.
But thats what SCI is currenty doing:
1x5 is heavy, 2x10 is light and 5x5 is medium.
HLM and 5x5 (which is what Texas Method is an extrapolation of) are not really anything alike. Although one could categorise 5x5//Starr//TM as having 'H', 'L' and 'M' days, I personally think that's a fairly liberal use of the English language. SST is better categorised as volume-assistance-strength. The volume, more so than the load determines what you're lifting. Only after you can hit 5x5 do you increase the volume. Only after you get the 1x5 (after warm up of course) do you increase the load. If you can't get your volume done, the load is reduced, etc etc.
SST programs, which is what Sci is doing, are volume intensive, basically to shore up strength gains. HLM tends to work in the rep ranges of 3-5, 10-15, 8-10 and I just can't see how the hell you're building muscle with so minimal load.
@Sci - was backtracking your log, congrats on the daughter .
I understand what you mean. It depends on the view.
Sure workload wise a 5x5 is harder than 1x5. Nevertheless 1x5 will be "heavier" regarding load on the bar.
So it depends out of which factor you structure the days.
I think HLM will mainly build sarcoplasmatic hypertrophy. And the heavy day a bit sarcomer. Comparable with wendlers 531 day and assistant days (3-5x10)
Heck! I'm heavier than you now by a couple of pounds. When are you gonna quit fat stripping?Rough week at work, I injured my ribs at work, after brutalizing my abs in a soccer game with the neighborhood kids.
Haven't been to the gym in 5 days, so today I just lifted as heavy as possible for everything. Lost a little strength. Weighed in at 197, so at least I am losing weight though slowly.