scientific muscle
New Member
Funny you mention that steve...the same conversation happened at bodyrecomposition.com regarding deadlifts. Everyone said I was nuts and I won't be able to do it as I get stronger. I think it can be done, IF m-time is long enough AND as long as you don't go over a certain intensity (1 rm%).
Also I have been reading ALOT about periodized strength training. I still want to be a powerlifter but I haven't found a training system I like yet for it and I am basically developing my own based on research done on trained athletes and periodized strength training is by far the most superior. There is sufficient evidence that trained individuals have superior gains in mass and strength using periodized programs as opposed to traditional linear progression models and I suspect that is why Bryan Haycock uses undulating progression in HST and Daniel Moore uses it in Max-stim, the 5x5 advanced program uses it, and on and on.
I have to face facts that as things get heavier I won't be able to maintain the volume as I thought I would. The KEY to periodized strength training is to have a high volume/low intensity phase and a high-intensity/low volume phase (kind of like Korte's program, or dual-factor 5x5 routines and many others, especially olympic lifting programs).
What has piqued my interest the most is the daily undulating progression models (dup). Basically like intermediate 5x5 or westside where each 'cycle' lasts a week or two. For example medium on monday, light on wednesday, heavy on friday.
Based on a bunch of research and my own personal needs, I have setup a new model where the training cycle lasts two weeks. The workouts are monday, wednesday and friday alternating A & B routines. The first workouts for A & B on the first monday and wednesday are the high-volume/low intensity phase. 30 reps done at 70% of 1rm. The next workouts on Friday and Monday are medium in volume and intensity, 15 reps at 85% of 1 rm. The last Wedneday and Friday of the two-week cycle are the max-effort days. High-intensity/low volume using 100% of 1rm for three attempts, going for personal records. I think at my stage (intermediate) it is still possible for me to make small progress in my PRs every two weeks. Weekly PRs are no longer an option for me as I found out last strength cycle.
As I become more advanced, I will need to do longer periodized cycles.
I am interested in reading "Designing Resistance Training Programs" by Fleck and Kraemer. It is an exhaustive scientific work on strength training that covers every aspect of it. Big book (300+ pages) and it costs over $50, so if anyone has read it and can give their opinion I would appreciate it.
"Practical programming' by Rippetoe and Kilgore was not scientific enough for me, and I was a little disappointed in it.
Also I have been reading ALOT about periodized strength training. I still want to be a powerlifter but I haven't found a training system I like yet for it and I am basically developing my own based on research done on trained athletes and periodized strength training is by far the most superior. There is sufficient evidence that trained individuals have superior gains in mass and strength using periodized programs as opposed to traditional linear progression models and I suspect that is why Bryan Haycock uses undulating progression in HST and Daniel Moore uses it in Max-stim, the 5x5 advanced program uses it, and on and on.
I have to face facts that as things get heavier I won't be able to maintain the volume as I thought I would. The KEY to periodized strength training is to have a high volume/low intensity phase and a high-intensity/low volume phase (kind of like Korte's program, or dual-factor 5x5 routines and many others, especially olympic lifting programs).
What has piqued my interest the most is the daily undulating progression models (dup). Basically like intermediate 5x5 or westside where each 'cycle' lasts a week or two. For example medium on monday, light on wednesday, heavy on friday.
Based on a bunch of research and my own personal needs, I have setup a new model where the training cycle lasts two weeks. The workouts are monday, wednesday and friday alternating A & B routines. The first workouts for A & B on the first monday and wednesday are the high-volume/low intensity phase. 30 reps done at 70% of 1rm. The next workouts on Friday and Monday are medium in volume and intensity, 15 reps at 85% of 1 rm. The last Wedneday and Friday of the two-week cycle are the max-effort days. High-intensity/low volume using 100% of 1rm for three attempts, going for personal records. I think at my stage (intermediate) it is still possible for me to make small progress in my PRs every two weeks. Weekly PRs are no longer an option for me as I found out last strength cycle.
As I become more advanced, I will need to do longer periodized cycles.
I am interested in reading "Designing Resistance Training Programs" by Fleck and Kraemer. It is an exhaustive scientific work on strength training that covers every aspect of it. Big book (300+ pages) and it costs over $50, so if anyone has read it and can give their opinion I would appreciate it.
"Practical programming' by Rippetoe and Kilgore was not scientific enough for me, and I was a little disappointed in it.